Asian states

1.     The development of the world always was constructed on balance between two parts: leading countries and followed ones. Historically European states considered to be quite developed in comparison to Asian states. For example: democracy firstly arose in Europe and only nowadays in Asian countries the idea of democracy is considered by the state governments. Talking about managment both Europe and Asia have different techniques that are commonly used in everyday life. Main characteristics that can easily indicate management varaeties are values, belifes, and mangment techniques. 

Firstly, value is considered to be one of the most effective ruling technique. In European states most  pupular way of becoming successful is individualism. To illustrate: all the western people prefer to think about the wealth and benefits of the own rather than of the community. While in Asian states, where the conservative style of thinkig is still important: wealth of the many is more important that health of the one. 

The second important difference is beliefes. In Europe main leading value and a belief is that all the people are equal from their birth, and have equal rights for any possibilities and opportunities no matter of their backgrounds. To demonstrate, all the people are obligated to obey natural, state, and constitutional laws, and for breaking any of it one is to be punished appropriately by the juridical branch. Meanwhile, in most of the Asian states, there are some personalities that are out of the society and considered to be «better» than the others. 

The third signicficant difference is managment techniques. In European states paper «staff» is popular. Every procedure must be on a paper with stamp and signatures which is a guarantee of the above mentioned olbigations, for examle, of the contract, or aything else. Most of the actions are done «on-line» which is faster and better. People live in a dynamic world of constatnt information access. However, in Asia, most of the procedures are long enough and require tolerance. People prefer keep their money at home, rather than in banks, because they find it more safe and comfortable. Or they prefer meet face to face, which may take long time and covering long distance, while they can easily use internet access for the deal. 

Summing up, European and Asian states differ much enough. However european states are dynamically developing and lead the whole world, one may see what has happened after the Global Financial Crisis: the market systems collapsed and governments had to reconstruct the whole banking system again, which still is needed to be done properly.  These was caused by transactions of debts from one country to another, and thousands of people lost their money and jobs as a result.

Asian states did not fell the crisis that much only because of their conservative style of livivng, and many of them are starting up their ways toward establishment of proper political, economic, and social systems. 

But in Asia only Japan management is well developed.Thus they hav kept their culture.  If we compare only Japanese management, Decisions are accepted long. They prefer to greet with business partners  in the: to do bow.

     And many Asian people for example about character Arabian people says very loudly and they very urgent when they conducting negotiations with their business partner. 

2. Americans very much appreciate work of real professionals, thus they adore the presentations which technology of carrying out is finished at them to degree of high art. It is preferable to begin negotiations, already having on hands a certain program of actions, if not the draft agreement. Representing the company, it is not necessary to go in cycles too in lacks of her work - to express in is positive-optimistic spirit better. 

Negotiations, in the thorough image prepared, will pass in quiet, business and friendly atmosphere. The good-natured humour on a conversation course is welcomed: he helps to remove stress, Americans survive on wearisome work in many respects thanks to this ability to dilute with a joke serious conversations. 

However, it is not necessary to be fond: it is not necessary to start conversations on religious and political themes or to try to discuss "ethnic question". Such subjects can be mentioned only in private conversation, and that is accurate, if only relations with the partner have to such affinity. 

At negotiations the American partners behave openly enough and informally. To interrupt the lecturer with a question on a course of presentation it is not considered a crime. They, without inquiries, will give as much as possible detailed information on the business, trying to present "a full picture". In dialogue with them mutual information interchange (certainly, not confidential), flexibility in decision-making process and ability to creative is recommended to "brain storm". They are accurately aimed at practical result that is why show the big ingenuity in inconvenient situations and when it is required to find the non-standard decision.